🦉 UnitOwl

Brinell to Rockwell C

1 Brinell (HBW) = 0Rockwell C (HRC)

By KAMP Inc. / UnitOwl · Last reviewed:

Result
0 HRC
1 HBW = 0 HRC
Ad Slot (horizontal)

How Do You Convert Brinell to Rockwell C?

Converting Brinell hardness (HBW) to Rockwell C (HRC) requires going through an intermediate step, since neither scale converts directly to the other via a simple formula. The most reliable method is using the ASTM E140 conversion table, which provides empirically determined equivalences. As an approximation, you can convert HBW to Vickers (HV is roughly 1.05 times HBW for values under 350, rising above that), then HV to HRC. Common reference points from ASTM E140: 200 HBW = about 15 HRC (borderline — HRC is not recommended below 20), 300 HBW = about 32 HRC, 400 HBW = about 43 HRC, 500 HBW = about 51 HRC. The Brinell test uses a 10mm tungsten carbide ball under a 3,000 kgf load (for steel), making it ideal for castings, forgings, and raw materials with coarse grain structures. Rockwell C is better for finished, hardened parts. Foundries and forges test incoming material hardness in Brinell, while heat treatment shops report final hardness in Rockwell C, creating a constant need for HBW-to-HRC conversion in the manufacturing chain.

How to Convert Brinell to Rockwell C

  1. Start with your Brinell hardness (HBW) measurement.
  2. Refer to ASTM E140 for the direct conversion, or approximate using the two-step method: convert HBW to HV, then HV to HRC.
  3. For values under 350 HBW, HV is approximately HBW x 1.05.
  4. Then apply the HV-to-HRC inverse formula or table.
  5. Key ASTM E140 reference points: 250 HBW = 24 HRC, 300 HBW = 32 HRC, 350 HBW = 37 HRC, 400 HBW = 43 HRC, 450 HBW = 47 HRC, 500 HBW = 51 HRC.

Real-World Examples

A steel casting is Brinell tested at 280 HBW. Does it meet a minimum 28 HRC spec after heat treatment?
ASTM E140: 280 HBW = approximately 29 HRC. Yes, it marginally meets the 28 HRC minimum, but retest if the spec is critical.
Forged steel arrives at the machine shop with a certificate showing 350 HBW. What HRC is that?
ASTM E140: 350 HBW = approximately 37 HRC. This is a medium hardness suitable for machining but indicates the material has some pre-hardening.
A specification for wear-resistant steel plate requires minimum 450 HBW (or equivalent HRC).
ASTM E140: 450 HBW = approximately 47 HRC. You can verify on a Rockwell tester: parts should test at or above 47 HRC.
Raw 4140 steel bar stock tests at 220 HBW in the annealed condition. What HRC is that?
ASTM E140: 220 HBW = approximately 18 HRC. This is at the lower edge of the HRC scale — the material is relatively soft and very machinable.

Quick Reference

Brinell (HBW)Rockwell C (HRC)
10
20
30
50
100
150
200
250
500
750
1001.08918
25026.0951
50045.611
1,00076.105

History of Brinell and Rockwell C

The Brinell test was invented in 1900 by Swedish engineer Johan August Brinell. It was the first widely standardized hardness test and used a hardened steel ball (later tungsten carbide, designated HBW) to create an indentation whose diameter was measured. The Brinell test became the standard for testing raw materials — castings, forgings, and bar stock — because the large indentation averages out microstructural variations. The Rockwell test (1914) was faster and became the standard for finished parts. The gap between incoming material tested in Brinell and finished parts tested in Rockwell C created an enduring need for conversion tables. ASTM E140 bridges this gap with experimentally validated equivalences that manufacturing has relied on for over 70 years.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Assuming HBW equals HRC. These are completely different scales with different numerical ranges. 300 HBW does not equal 300 HRC (which would be physically impossible — HRC only goes to about 70).
  • Using the Brinell test above its valid range. The standard Brinell test (10mm ball, 3000 kgf) is generally reliable up to about 450-500 HBW. Above this, the tungsten carbide ball begins to deform, giving falsely low readings. For very hard materials, use Rockwell C or Vickers.
  • Forgetting to specify the Brinell test conditions. HBW (tungsten carbide ball) and HBS (steel ball, obsolete) give different results on the same material. Modern standards require HBW. Old data reported as HBS may not convert accurately.
  • Using a cast-iron or non-ferrous Brinell reading with a steel HRC conversion table. ASTM E140 separates materials because the same HBW number can correspond to different Rockwell behavior across alloys.
Ad Slot (auto)

Frequently Asked Questions

When should I test in Brinell versus Rockwell?
Use Brinell for castings, forgings, bar stock, and any material with a coarse or non-uniform microstructure — the large indentation averages out local variations. Use Rockwell C for hardened, heat-treated parts with relatively uniform hardness. A rule of thumb: raw materials go to Brinell, finished parts go to Rockwell.
What is the maximum hardness the Brinell test can measure?
Practically, about 650 HBW with a tungsten carbide ball. However, accuracy degrades above about 450-500 HBW. For hardened tool steels and similar materials above 500 HBW (about 51 HRC), Vickers or Rockwell C testing is preferred.
Why are there so many hardness scales?
Each scale was developed for a specific need. Brinell (1900) for bulk materials. Rockwell (1914) for fast production testing. Vickers (1921) for universal and micro testing. Shore (1920s) for rubbers and polymers. Mohs (1812) for minerals. Each measures a different material response under different conditions, which is why exact conversions are impossible.
What HRC is 300 HBW?
300 HBW is approximately 32 HRC in ASTM E140 for steel. That sits in a medium-hard range often seen in tempered alloy steels.
Can I certify final hardened parts by Brinell alone?
Usually not for high-hardness finished parts. Once the part is well into the Rockwell C range, Rockwell or Vickers testing is normally preferred because Brinell becomes less reliable and more intrusive.
Quick Tip

For quick shop-floor estimation: divide the HBW value by 10 and subtract a couple of points to get a rough HRC. For example, 350 HBW / 10 = 35, minus 2 = 33 HRC (actual is about 37 HRC). This is very rough but catches gross errors like confusing HBW and HRC scales.

Sources & References